Breach of Real Estate Contract in Ontario (Buyer or Seller)

Real estate contract disputes in Ontario often involve a failed closing, deposit issues, and competing damages claims. These cases move quickly because mitigation and market evidence can become critical.

Common real estate breach scenarios

• Buyer fails to close
• Seller refuses to close
• Deposit disputes
• Repudiation / anticipatory breach before closing
• Disputes about conditions, notices, or extensions

Remedies typically in dispute

• Deposit treatment (fact and contract dependent) – Generally in most cases if the buyer fails to close they will forfeit their deposit and the vendor has the choice of seeking only the deposit or the deposit plus damages with the deposit acting as a credit towards their damages.
• Damages based on market movement and provable losses
• Specific performance (in appropriate cases)
• Mitigation evidence (re-listing, timelines, offers, market proof)

---

FAQ

What happens if a buyer breaches a real estate contract in Ontario?

Outcomes depend on the agreement and facts. Disputes often involve deposits, damages, mitigation steps, and the record of events leading to the failed closing. Often the seller will have the right to choose between suing for the deposit or suing for the deposit plus damages for the remainder of their losses.

What happens if a seller refuses to close?

Depending on the circumstances, disputes may involve damages and, in some cases, arguments about specific performance. Timing and evidence are critical.

Does breach automatically mean the deposit is forfeited?

Deposit disputes are fact- and contract-dependent. The agreement wording and the timeline of events often matter significantly.

What evidence matters most in APS breach disputes?

The agreement of purchase and sale, amendments, notices, communications, closing documents, and mitigation evidence (including re-listing and market proof).

Is anticipatory breach relevant in real estate?

It can be. Disputes sometimes arise before closing when a party signals they will not complete the transaction. Contract wording and response strategy matter.